An EPC does not buy because the meeting went well. It buys after you are an approved vendor with an accepted technical file and a project that needs pricing.
In the EPC and developer accounts we work, opening a European account for a Turkish solar or metal manufacturer usually means clearing three gates, and a good commercial meeting clears none of them: vendor registration completed in the buyer's procurement system, a technical file accepted by the buyer's engineering team, and a quotation priced against a named project with a real build date. In the programmes we have run, work that stalled had stalled at one of those three.
All three have to be cleared, and they can be worked in parallel with commercial contact rather than after it: identify the developers, EPCs and agrivoltaics players actually building in the target market, reach the person who qualifies suppliers, complete vendor registration, get the technical documentation in front of the engineering team, and hold the follow-up until a project-specific quotation is requested. Kickoff has run this into Czechia, Italy and Iberia for solar tracker and mounting manufacturers, and into 20+ markets for low-voltage enclosure export.
A Turkish manufacturer arriving in a European renewables market usually leads with capability — capacity, certification, references, price. It is the right material in the wrong order. The buyer's first question is not whether you can make it. It is whether you are an approved vendor, whether your file passes their technical review, and whether procurement can raise a purchase order against you without an exception.
Each is an administrative gate with a named owner inside the buyer, and none is reached through a sales conversation alone. The gates can run in parallel with commercial contact — what they cannot do is come after it.
Which developers and EPCs have projects at a stage where mounting or structural steel is still being sourced, in which region, on what build timeline. A developer with a strong brand and nothing under construction is not a target this quarter.
In EPCs and developers that is rarely the commercial contact on the website. It is procurement, supplier quality, or an engineering lead — and the approach has to be built for what that person is measured on.
Unglamorous, slow, and the thing that converts a conversation into an account. Portals, forms, certifications, financial documentation, compliance declarations. We complete these on the manufacturer's behalf rather than sending them back with a to-do list.
Structural calculations, certifications, drawings, load cases, corrosion specification. Where the goods classify under CN 7308 they are inside CBAM scope, and a verified installation-level emissions figure belongs in this package rather than in a compliance folder — for a scrap-fed EAF producer it is frequently an argument rather than a cost. The mechanics are on our CBAM page.
The gap between an accepted technical file and a first project quotation is measured in months and crosses several people. Several programmes we have taken over had gone quiet at exactly this point.
One honest number, because the denominator is the part usually left out: in a single Italy and Iberia EPC wave, 35 first approaches produced three live conversations. A reply rate quoted without the list it came from is not information.
The vendor registrations, the target lists, the contacts and the working files belong to the manufacturer. The engagement is fixed-term and renewable, and it is built so the rhythm survives the handover — the goal is a commercial function that keeps running when we step back, not a dependency.
Through vendor registration and technical qualification, not through a sales meeting. Identify EPCs with live project pipeline, reach the supplier-qualification owner rather than the commercial contact, complete the vendor registration package, and get the technical file — structural calculations, certifications, load cases, corrosion specification, and the CBAM emissions position where the goods are in scope — in front of engineering. Then follow up until a named project needs pricing.
First substantive conversations in weeks. On the registrations we have taken through, vendor registration has run one to three months once the right person is engaged. A project-specific quotation depends on the buyer's build pipeline rather than on your progress — a manufacturer can be fully approved and still wait a quarter for a project that fits. We have seen a cold first approach reach quotation stage in seven weeks; that is fast and we do not present it as the norm.
Where a mounting structure classifies under CN 7308, it is inside CBAM scope. Solar mounting is not named in Annex I, so classification has to be settled on the specific product rather than assumed. Full detail — including what a verified emissions figure is worth commercially and what it is not — is on our CBAM page.
Work to date has concentrated in Italy, Iberia, Czechia and Central Europe, alongside enclosure export across 20+ markets in the EU and the Gulf. Market selection follows the manufacturer's actual product fit and certification position, not market size — and we say early when a market on the plan is not worth the quarter. We carry a limited number of accounts at a time; this is per-account work, not an unbounded European pipeline.
If your European programme has good meetings and no purchase orders, the first place we look is the three qualification gates — and which of them is unowned.
Talk about the work >